UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHARLES J. RUNKLE,
AMITAVA SENGUPTA and
TONY R. VIDO
____________
Appeal 2007-0838
Application 09/851,242
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: October 29, 2007
____________
Before CHARLES F. WARREN, PETER F. KRATZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 16-19, and 21-27. Claims 6-15 are the only other claims
that remain pending in this application. The latter claims stand withdrawn
from further consideration by the Examiner as drawn to a non-elected
invention. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013