Ex Parte Wilson - Page 1





         1        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
         2                for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                
         3                                                                                                             
         4                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
         5                                          ___________                                                        
         6                                                                                                             
         7                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
         8                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
         9                                          ___________                                                        
        10                                                                                                             
        11                                Ex parte  DAVID J. WILSON                                                    
        12                                          ___________                                                        
        13                                                                                                             
        14                                       Appeal 2007-0896                                                      
        15                                    Application 09/731,019                                                   
        16                                   Technology Center 2100                                                    
        17                                          ___________                                                        
        18                                                                                                             
        19                                    Decided: May 22, 2007                                                    
        20                                          ___________                                                        
        21                                                                                                             
        22    Before HUBERT C. LORIN, STUART S. LEVY and ANTON W. FETTING,                                             
        23    Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                            
        24    FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                    

        25                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
        26                                                                                                             
        27                                                                                                             
        28                                   STATEMENT OF CASE                                                         
        29        This appeal involves claims 1, 2, and 7-17, the only claims pending in this                          
        30    application.  We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and                        
        31    134.                                                                                                     

        32                                                                                                             
        33        We AFFIRM.                                                                                           










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013