Ex Parte Polan et al - Page 1

                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                 for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.                

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                          Ex parte MICHAEL G. POLAN, MARIKA JOANNIDIS,                                      
                            STEPHEN P. ROBERTS, JOHN W. STEPHENSON,                                         
                                         and GABI ROTHENSTEIN                                               
                                              Appeal 2007-0937                                              
                                           Application 10/666,869                                           
                                          Technology Center 2100                                            
                                           Decided: May 30, 2007                                            
               Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, ROBERT E. NAPPI,                                                 
               and JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
               GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                

                                       STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                
                      Polan, Joannidis, Roberts, Stephenson, and Rothenstein (Appellants)                   
               appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1                 

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013