Appeal 2007-0937
Application 10/666,869
Fletcher II discloses invoking the provisioning processes data for the
provisioning web service.
Thus, Fletcher II discloses storing provisioning processes data
for each web service that correlates to an administrative system
supporting the web services and invoking that data. Accordingly, we
will sustain the anticipation rejection of claim 1 and the claims
grouped therewith, claims 2, 3, 8, 11, and 12, over Fletcher II.
Under the provisions of 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b), we enter the following
new ground of rejection against Appellants' claim 13.
Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by
Fletcher II. Claim 13 is identical to claim 12 except that it depends from
claim 8 instead of claim 1. The Examiner rejected independent claims 1 and
8 and also claim 12 under 102(e) as anticipated by Fletcher II. We have
affirmed the anticipation rejection of claims 1, 8, and 12. Therefore, claim
13 is anticipated for the same reasons as claim 12.
ORDER
The decision of the Examiner rejecting claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
second paragraph, is reversed. The decision of the Examiner rejecting
claims 1 through 3, 5, 8, 9, and 11 through 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is
reversed as to claims 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, and 11 through 13 over Fletcher I, but
affirmed as to claims 1 through 3, 8, 11, and 12 over Fletcher II. Further, we
have entered a new ground of rejection for claim 13 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(e) over Fletcher II. Thus, the Examiner's decision is affirmed-in-part.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013