Ex Parte Joshi - Page 3



            Appeal No. 2007-0943                                                  Page 3                    
            Application No. 09/965,163                                                                      

                   • Claim 38 (Br. 12-14).                                                                  

            I. Claims 1, 14, 18, and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                 
            Moody in view of Brune and Brandstetter (US 2003/0036427 A1)                                    
                   Pursuant to the rules, the Board selects representative claim 1 to decide the            
            appeal with respect to this group of claims.  37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii) (2006).  It          
            reads as follows:                                                                               
                   1.  A method of playing a gaming machine, comprising:                                    
                         receiving a wager to initiate play of a game on the gaming machine;                
                         randomly selecting an outcome for the game from a plurality of                     
                   possible outcomes;                                                                       
                         awarding a monetary payout from the gaming machine for a winning                   
                   outcome;                                                                                 
                         dispensing a tangible sweepstakes entry form from the gaming                       
                   machine in response to a predetermined triggering condition, said triggering             
                   condition being based on at least one of a number of game plays, a                       
                   frequency of play, a number of activated pay lines, a player-tracking                    
                   information, and a time of day;                                                          
                         completing the tangible sweepstakes entry form manually with                       
                   identifying indicia;                                                                     
                         submitting the sweepstakes entry form to enter the sweepstakes                     
                   without involving the gaming machine; and                                                
                         conducting the sweepstakes after the sweepstakes entry form is                     
                   dispensed from the gaming machine.                                                       
                   A. Issue                                                                                 
                   Appellant contends that (1) the prior art does not teach or disclose the                 
            claimed triggering events that trigger the gaming machine to dispense the                       
            sweepstakes entry (Appeal Br. 8-9) and (2) there is no motivation or suggestion to              
            combine the references that would lead one of ordinary skill in the art to the                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013