The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KOHEI SUZUKI et al.
____________
Appeal 2007-1024
Application 10/231,144
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 7, 2007
____________
Before SALLY G. LANE, MICHAEL P. TIERNEY AND
JAMES T. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a 35 U.S.C. § 134 appeal in the above-referenced application1
of the rejection of claims 10 and 12-17. Claim 9, the only other pending
claim in the application is withdrawn from consideration as being directed to
a non-elected invention. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35
U.S.C. § 6(b).
1 The real party in interest is Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (Br. 1).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013