onecle

Ex Parte Sett et al - Page 1




                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                        
                      written for publication and is not inding precedent of the Board.b                                                       

                        UNITED STATES P       ATENT AND TRAD       EMARK OFFICE                                
                                             ________________                                                  
                              BEFORE T    HE BOARD OF PATENT         APPEALS                                   
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                             ________________                                                  
                      Ex parte SUBHAM S      ETT and SHAWN JA      Y CUNNINGHAM                                
                                             ________________                                                  
                                              Appeal 2007-1055                                                 
                                           Application 10/831,012                                              
                                          Technology Center 2800                                               
                                             ________________                                                  
                                          Decided:  March 23, 2007                                             
                                             ________________                                                  
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRI               S, and                                 
                T HOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                KIMLIN,   Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 7, 9, and                  
                11-21.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                               
                1. A method for fabricating a micro-scale device having internal                               
                heat spreading capability to reduce operating temperature, comprising the                      
                steps of :                                                                                     
                                                                                                              
                forming a heterostructure on a substrate comprising one or more di  electric                   
                layers and a first conductive layer having a first array of electrical                         
                                                                                                              



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013