Ex Parte McWilliams - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board                                            
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                         ____________________                                               
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                         ____________________                                               
                                      Ex parte RICK McWILLIAMS                                              
                                         ____________________                                               
                                            Appeal 2007-1087                                                
                                          Application 11/150,806                                            
                                         Technology Center 2800                                             
                                         ____________________                                               
                                          Decided: July 26, 2007                                            
                                         ____________________                                               
               Before LANCE LEONARD BARRY, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and JAY P.                                    
               LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
               SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                 
                      Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s                        
               Final Rejection of claims 9, 17, and 18.  As the appeal is limited only to                   
               these claims (Br. 3); claims 10-16, which are still pending and finally                      
               rejected, are not before this panel.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                   
               § 6(b).                                                                                      
                      Appellant’s invention relates to an automatic telescope capable of                    
               determining an orientation without requiring input from a user or an external                




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013