Appeal 2007-1105
Application 09/731,912
1 within the electronic document” (Br. 3:4-5) or the selected (and edited)
2 portion includes “template information or formatting information”
3 (Br. 3:6-13).
4 With respect to claims 34, 38, and 42, Appellant further contends that
5 the reference disclosures do not disclose or suggest “the formatting
6 information is distinct from editable content items of the electronic
7 document” (Br. 7:15-19).
8 With respect to claims 35, 39, and 43, Appellant further contends that
9 the reference disclosures do not disclose or suggest “merging a modified
10 content item back into an electronic document under the condition where
11 template information or formatting information of the document was altered
12 while a content item was modified” (Br. 8:1-3).
13 With respect to claims 36, 40, and 44, Appellant further contends that
14 the reference disclosures do not disclose or suggest merging “a modified
15 item template back into the electronic document even if the content of one or
16 more items managed by the item template was altered while the item
17 template item was being modified” (Br. 8:14-16).
18 We affirm.
19
20 ISSUE(S)
21 Has Appellant shown that the Examiner has failed to establish one
22 skilled in the art would have incorporated editable template and format
23 information into Chang’s editing of Sparrow community-shared web page
24 documents in such a manner as to obtain “group-editable web page editing
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013