Ex Parte Nason et al - Page 8

                Appeal 2007-1127                                                                             
                Application 09/800,112                                                                       

                                         CONCLUSION OF LAW                                                   
                      (1)  Appellants have failed to establish that the Examiner erred in                    
                rejecting claims 22-41 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over                   
                Matsumoto and Thornton.                                                                      
                      (2)  Claims 22-41 are not patentable.                                                  

                                                DECISION                                                     
                      The Examiner's rejection of claims 22-41 is Affirmed.                                  

                                                AFFIRMED                                                     













                KIS                                                                                          

                WILLIAM J. SAPONE                                                                            
                COLEMAN SUDOL SAPONE P.C.                                                                    
                714 COLORADO AVENUE                                                                          
                BRIDGE PORT, CT 06605                                                                        

                                                     8                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8

Last modified: September 9, 2013