Ex Parte Waldenburg - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-1181                                                                             
                Application 10/513,879                                                                       

                      Claims 15 and 16 are illustrative of the invention and are reproduced                  
                below:                                                                                       
                      15. A device for detecting the presence of occult blood in feces, said                 
                device comprising a liquid tight packet that is opened manually, said packet                 
                including a sheet of absorbent material impregnated with a liquid solution                   
                that reacts with feces to produce a color change when blood is present, said                 
                packet being evacuated to remove air therefrom and sealed to prevent the                     
                liquid solution from escaping the packet until opened to use the impregnated                 
                sheet of absorbent material, said packet being essentially impermeable to                    
                light and air.                                                                               
                      16. The device of Claim 15 where the liquid solution comprises                         
                guaiac material and hydrogen peroxide.                                                       
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                      
                unpatentability:                                                                             
                Guadagno   US 4,582,685   Apr. 15, 1986                                                      
                Waldenburg   US 5,840,584   Nov. 24, 1998                                                    

                      The Examiner made the following rejections:                                            
                      1.  Claims 14-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over                            
                Guadagno.                                                                                    
                      2.  Claims 8-12 and 16-17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over                   
                Guadagno in view of Waldenburg.                                                              

                                                     ISSUE                                                   
                      The Examiner contends that the invention as claimed would have been                    
                obvious in view of the applied prior art.  Appellant contends that the applied               
                prior art fails to disclose or suggest the claim limitation of “air evacuation of            


                                                     2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013