Ex Parte Shang - Page 1



           1                The opinion in support of the decision being entered                             
           2                    today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 
           3                                                                                                 
           4                                                                                                 
           5            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
           6                                   ____________                                                  
           7                                                                                                 
           8                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
           9                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
          10                                   ____________                                                  
          11                                                                                                 
          12                              Ex parte PING SHANG                                                
          13                                   ____________                                                  
          14                                                                                                 
          15                                 Appeal 2007-1281                                                
          16                              Application 10/104,3861                                            
          17                              Technology Center 2600                                             
          18                                   ____________                                                  
          19                                                                                                 
          20                            Decided: October 12, 2007                                            
          21                                   ____________                                                  
          22                                                                                                 
          23                                                                                                 
          24    Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and                                          
          25    CAROLYN D. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
          26                                                                                                 
          27    THOMAS, C., Administrative Patent Judge.                                                     
          28                                                                                                 
          29                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
          30                                                                                                 




                                                                                                            
                1 Filing date: March 21, 2002.  The real party in interest is SAE Magnetics                  
                (H.K.) Ltd.                                                                                  



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013