Ex Parte Holtslag et al - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today               
                             is not binding precedent of the Board.                       
                                                                                         

                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                              
                                       __________                                         
                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                       
                                       __________                                         
                  Ex parte ANTONIUS HENDRICUS MARIA HOLTSLAG and                          
                         JURGEN JEAN LOUIS HOPPENBROUWERS                                 
                                       __________                                         
                                     Appeal 2007-1283                                     
                                   Application 09/772,477                                 
                                  Technology Center 2600                                  
                                       __________                                         
                                  Decided: August 29, 2007                                
                                       __________                                         
             Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, JAY P. LUCAS, and                                
             ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.                        
             COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                      
                  This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) from the          
             Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-8.  We have jurisdiction under              
             35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                                            
                  We AFFIRM.                                                              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013