The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PAPARAO PALACHARLA, HOK YONG PUA,
EMIR CATOVIC, and HARBHAJAN VIRDEE
_____________
Appeal 2007-1287
Application 10/161,274
Technology Center 2600
______________
Decided: June 1, 2007
_______________
Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and ST. JOHN
COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final rejection of
claims 1 through 6, and 9 through 24. For the reasons stated infra, we affirm-in-
part the Examiner’s rejection of these claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013