Ex Parte Palacharla et al - Page 7



             Appeal No. 2007-1287                                                                                     
             Application No. 10/161,274                                                                               

                    A "manufacture" and a "composition of matter" are defined in Diamond v.                           
             Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303, 308, 206 USPQ 193, 196-97 (1980):                                             
                    [T]his Court has read the term "manufacture" in §101 in accordance with its                       
                    dictionary definition to mean "the production of articles for use from raw or                     
                    prepared materials by giving to these materials new forms, qualities,                             
                    properties, or combinations, whether by hand-labor or by machinery."                              
                    American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Brogdex Co., 283 U.S. 1, 11 (1931).                               
                    Similarly, "composition of matter" has been construed consistent with its                         
                    common usage to include "all compositions of two or more substances and                           
                    ... all composite articles, whether they be results of chemical union, or of                      
                    mechanical mixture, or whether they be gases, fluids, powders or solids."                         
                    Shell Development Co. v. Watson, 149 F. Supp. 279, 280 (D.C. 1957) (citing                        
                    1 A. Deller, Walker on Patents § 14, p. 55 (1st ed. 1937).  [Parallel citations                   
                    omitted.]                                                                                         
                    The signal is not composed of matter and is clearly not a "composition of                         
             matter."                                                                                                 
                    A "manufacture" is the residual category for products.  1 Chisum, Patents                         
             § 1.02[3] (2004) (citing W. Robinson, The Law of Patents for Useful Inventions                           
             270 (1890)).  If a signal falls within any category of § 101, it must fall within this                   
             category.  The definition of "manufacture" from Diamond v. Chakrabarty requires                          
             a tangible article prepared from materials.  The other cases dealing with                                
             manufactures also require a tangible physical article.  The CCPA held in                                 
             In re Hruby, 373 F.2d 997, 153 USPQ 61 (CCPA 1967) that there was no                                     
             distinction between the meaning of "manufacture" in § 101 and "article of                                
             manufacture" in § 171 for designs.  The issue in Hruby was whether that portion of                       
             a water fountain which is composed entirely of water in motion was an article of                         
             manufacture.  The CCPA relied on the analysis of the term "manufacture" in Riter-                        
             Conley Mfg. Co. v. Aiken, 203 F. 699 (3d Cir. 1913), a case involving a utility                          
             patent.  The CCPA stated in Hruby:                                                                       

                                                          7                                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013