Ex Parte Bechara et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                         Ex parte IBRAHIM BECHARA and ANATOLY LIPKIN                                         
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1386                                                
                                          Application 10/439,922                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Decided:  August 15,2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and                                                
                LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 2, 4-8, and 14-27,                
                the only claims pending in the application.  We have jurisdiction under                      
                35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                                            
                      We AFFIRM.                                                                             
                      The invention relates to preparation of polyurethane dispersions from                  
                fast reacting aromatic (MDI based) or aliphatic (HDI based) diisocyanates                    
                (Br. 8).  According to Appellants, they have found that by modifying the low                 




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013