onecle

Ex Parte Snyder - Page 1



        1        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
        2               for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
        3                                                                                                    
        4               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
        5                                      ___________                                                   
        6                                                                                                    
        7                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
        8                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
        9                                      ___________                                                   
       10                                                                                                    
       11                             Ex parte ROBERT L. SNYDER                                              
       12                                      ___________                                                   
       13                                                                                                    
       14                                    Appeal 2007-1457                                                
       15                                 Application 10/033,121                                             
       16                                Technology Center 3600                                              
       17                                      ___________                                                   
       18                                                                                                    
       19                                 Decided: April 27, 2007                                            
       20                                      ___________                                                   
       21                                                                                                    
       22   Before HUBERT C. LORIN, STUART S. LEVY, and ANTON W. FETTING,                                    
       22 Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                      
       23                                                                                                    
       24   FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            
       25                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
       26                                                                                                    
       27                                                                                                    
       28                                STATEMENT OF CASE                                                   
       29       This appeal from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-21, the only claims                    
       30   pending in this application, arises under 35 U.S.C.  134.  We have jurisdiction                 
       31   over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6 (2002).                                                
       32                                                                                                    
       33       We AFFIRM.                                                                                   







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013