Ex Parte Snyder - Page 2

            Appeal 2007-1457                                                                                 
            Application 10/033,121                                                                           

        1          The Appellant invented a self-service checkout system utilizing a component               
        2   video monitoring system, including a component video camera to obtain pictures                   
        3   of items for purchase.  Particularly, the self-service checkout system utilizes the              
        4   component video camera to obtain digital pictures of produce being weighed for                   
        5   purchase during the weighing process (Specification 4).  An understanding of the                 
        6   invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced                
        7   below.                                                                                           
        8          1. A method of operating a self-service checkout terminal comprising                      
        9          the steps of:                                                                             
       10          initiating a checkout transaction at the self-service checkout terminal;                  
       11          obtaining weight of a produce item via a scale of the self-service                        
       12          checkout terminal; and                                                                    
       13          acquiring a digital picture of the produce item via a component video                     
       14          camera of the self-service checkout terminal wherein the step of                          
       15          acquiring a digital picture is triggered by the step of obtaining the                     
       16          weight of the produce item.                                                               
       17                                                                                                    
       18       This appeal arises from the Examiner’s Final Rejection, mailed June 2, 2005.                 
       19   The Appellant filed an Appeal Brief in support of the appeal on June 7, 2006, and                
       20   the Examiner mailed an Examiner’s Answer to the Appeal Brief on September 13,                    
       21   2006.  A Reply Brief was filed on November 15, 2006.                                             
       22                                       PRIOR ART                                                    
       23       The prior art references of record relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the              
       24   appealed claims are:                                                                             
       25   Nishi                                  US 4,914,746             Apr. 3, 1990                     
       25 Humble                                                                                             
       26                                          US 5,426,282             Jun. 20, 1995                    
       26 Nakamura                                                                                           
       27                                          US 6,278,492 B1                   Aug. 21, 2001           


                                                      2                                                      


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013