Appeal 2007-1460
Application 10/481,336
2) The Examiner erred in rejecting claim 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
unpatentable over Fukushima.
DECISION
The Examiner’s rejection of claim 1 as anticipated by Fukushima is
sustained, and rejection of claim 2 as unpatentable over Fukushima is not
sustained.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
hh
MEREK, BLACKMON & VOORHEES, LLC
673 S. WASHINGTON ST
ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: September 9, 2013