onecle

Ex Parte Murofushi et al - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
                                is not binding precedent of the board                              

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                          _____________                                            
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                          _____________                                            
                        Ex parte EIJI MUROFUSHI and TAKAYUKI KATO                                  
           _____________                                                                           
                                      Appeal No. 2007-15301                                        
                                      Application 10/095,112                                       
                                     Technology Center 2800                                        
                                         ______________                                            
                                      Decided: July 13, 2007                                       
                                        _______________                                            

           Before JOHN C. MARTIN, JEAN R. HOMERE, and JOHN A. JEFFERY,                             
           Administrative Patent Judges.                                                           
           MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    

                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                                   STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                           
                 Appellants appeal from the Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 1-5, all of       
           the pending claims.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b) and 134.              
                 We affirm.                                                                        

                                                                                                  
                 1  Oral argument was heard on June 6, 2007.                                       




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013