Ex Parte Santos et al - Page 1



        1        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
        2               for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
        3                                                                                                    
        4               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
        5                                      ___________                                                   
        6                                                                                                    
        7                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
        8                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
        9                                      ___________                                                   
       10                                                                                                    
       11        Ex parte SUSAN R. SANTOS, STEPHEN D. SIMON, and KAREN COX                                   
       12                                      ___________                                                   
       13                                                                                                    
       14                                    Appeal 2007-1595                                                
       15                                 Application 09/751,858                                             
       16                                Technology Center 3600                                              
       17                                      ___________                                                   
       18                                                                                                    
       19                                 Decided: June 13, 2007                                             
       20                                      ___________                                                   
       21                                                                                                    
       22   Before STUART S. LEVY, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W. FETTING,                                    
       23   Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                    
       24   FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            
       25                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
       26                                                                                                    
       27                                                                                                    
       28                                STATEMENT OF CASE                                                   
       29       This appeal from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-21 and 27, the only                    
       30   claims pending in this application, arises under 35 U.S.C.  134.  We have                       
       31   jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6.                                          
       32                                                                                                    
       33       We REVERSE and ENTER A NEW GROUND OF REJECTION UNDER                                         
       34   37 C.F.R.  41.50(b).                                                                            






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013