onecle

Ex Parte Yamada - Page 1








                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                              ____________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                 
                                    Ex parte MASAHIKO YAMADA                                               
                                              ____________                                                 
                                            Appeal 2007-1733                                               
                                         Application 09/978,275                                            
                                         Technology Center 2600                                            
                                              ____________                                                 
                                        Decided: October 25, 2007                                          
                                              ____________                                                 

               Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, JEAN R. HOMERE, and                                                 
               MARC S. HOFF, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                 
               HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                
                      Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Examiner’s final                    
               rejection of claims 1 through 13, 20, 21, and 37 through 41.  We have                       
               jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b) to decide this appeal.  We reverse.                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013