Ex Parte Cobbley et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                    Ex parte CHAD A. COBBLEY and                                             
                                         TIMOTHY L. JACKSON                                                  
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1772                                                
                                          Application 10/672,750                                             
                                          Technology Center 2800                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Decided:  August 22, 2007                                           
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before CHUNG K. PAK, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                     
                JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of                 
                claims 35, 37-39, 45, 47-49, 63, 65-70, the only claims that remain pending                  
                in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6 and 134.               








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013