Ex Parte Ryan et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                     Ex parte WILLIAM E. RYAN JR,                                            
                          ROBERT K. GOTTLIEB, and JOSEPH D. MALLOZZI                                         
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1799                                                
                                          Application 10/036,991                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: July 10, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  


                Before DONALD E. ADAMS, ERIC GRIMES,                                                         
                and LORA M. GREEN,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
                ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 involves claims 1-15, the only                       
                claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                    
                 6(b).                                                                                      







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013