Ex Parte Ryan et al - Page 5

                Appeal  2007-1799                                                                            
                Application 10/036,991                                                                       
                In addition, the Examiner finds that Call teaches a system wherein a filtered                
                transition area is present on either side of the sanitation section (id.).                   
                      Call teaches that the incoming mail handling equipment and outgoing                    
                mail handing equipment associated with screened mail are generally                           
                conventional and well known in the art (Call 10: ¶ 0127; ‘674 11:16-18 and                   
                14:1-3).  According to Call,                                                                 
                      [m]ail  to  be  screened  for  contaminants  enters  containment                       
                      chamber . . . via a feeder . . . (generally a conveyor belt similar                    
                      to those employed in conventional mail processing rooms and                            
                      baggage  handling  systems  in  airports).    Feeder  .  .  .  moves                   
                      incoming mail . . . through a first seal . . . into containment                        
                      chamber  .  .  .  .    The  mail passes  through  the  width  of                       
                      containment chamber . . . and out through a second seal . . . .                        
                      Screened mail . . . that has passed through the system is then                         
                      available  for  further  processing.    Feeder  .  .  .  and  other                    
                      conventional equipment necessary to sort and manipulate mail                           
                      to enable items of mail to be individually fed into containment                        
                      chamber . . . are well known in the art; such equipment is                             
                      hereinafter referred to as “the incoming mail handler.”                                
                                                                                                            
                (Call 7-8: ¶ 0109; see also ‘674 11:5-19.)  Call teaches that “[t]he incoming                
                mail handler separates the mail into individual envelopes or packages, which                 
                enter into [the] containment chamber . . . in single file” (Call 8: ¶ 0111; ‘674             
                11:19).  Accordingly, Call teaches a component for singulating and feeding a                 
                mailpiece along a feed path of the system – e.g., an incoming mail handler.                  
                Therefore, we are not persuaded by Appellants’ assertion that Call does not                  
                teach a component for singulating mail pieces (Br. 13).                                      
                      As discussed above, Call teaches that the incoming mail handler feeds                  
                individual mailpieces into a containment chamber.  Call teaches a                            
                decontamination subsystem in the containment chamber that applies                            
                decontamination fluid as a spray to a contaminated parcel and the                            

                                                     5                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013