Ex Parte Stryer et al - Page 8

                Appeal 2007-1819                                                                             
                Application 09/886,055                                                                       
                (Answer 7-8).  In support of this assertion, the Examiner directs attention to               
                Table 3 at page 42 of Burford (id.).  According to Burford, “Table 3 shows                   
                structural features of each polypeptide sequence, including predicted motifs                 
                and domains, along with the methods, algorithms, and searchable databases                    
                used for analysis of each polypeptide” (Burford 5:¶ 0044).                                   
                      While, Table 3 discloses that Burford’s SEQ ID NO: 27 has some                         
                regions, and motifs, that share some degree of homology with an olfactory                    
                receptor, it also teaches that SEQ ID NO: 27 shares some degree of                           
                homology with, inter alia, the melanocortin receptor family and orphan                       
                receptors (Burford 42).7  In this regard, we note that, as Burford explains,                 
                receptors, “which act as receptors for stimuli that have yet to be identified”               
                (Burford 1: ¶ 0004) are known as orphan receptors.                                           
                      Apparently recognizing that Burford does not teach or reasonably                       
                suggest that SEQ ID NO: 27 is an olfactory receptor, the Examiner asserts                    
                that Appellants’ SEQ ID NO: 55 represents a structural homolog of, and is                    
                derived from, a sequence suggested by the prior art to be an olfactory                       
                receptor (Answer 9).  In all, the Examiner appears to be uninterested in the                 
                fact that Burford also teaches that SEQ ID NO: 27 also shares homology                       
                with other proteins.  Unlike the dissent, we will not take the Examiner’s bait.              
                      The issue is whether the art teaches or reasonably suggests that                       
                Appellants’ SEQ ID NO: 27 is an olfactory receptor.  The Examiner has not                    
                                                                                                            
                7 In addition, we recognize that Burford’s Table 2 discloses that the “nearest               
                GenBank homolog” (Burford 5: ¶ 0043) for SEQ ID NO: 27 is an olfactory                       
                receptor from Rattus norvegicus (Burford 38: Table 2-continued).  However,                   
                the Examiner makes no attempt to demonstrate that the degree of similarity                   
                between SEQ ID NO: 27 and Rattus norvegicus is sufficient to allow one of                    
                ordinary skill in the art to reasonably expect that SEQ ID NO: 27 is an                      
                olfactory receptor.                                                                          
                                                     8                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013