Ex Parte Fang et al - Page 5

                Appeal  2007-1824                                                                            
                Application 10/639,718                                                                       
                microspot1 of the array and unlabeled target which competes with the                         
                labeled cognate ligands for binding sites on the array (Lahiri 6: ¶ 0081).                   
                Therefore, Lahiri teaches the step of contacting a cocktail solution with an                 
                array in the presence of a target compound.  According to Lahiri, the affinity               
                of the target for the probe microspot relative to the labeled ligand is                      
                determined by the decrease in the amount of binding of the labeled ligand.                   
                      But for the specific affinity, specificity, and cross-reactivity of the                
                cognate ligands, Lahiri teaches the method set forth in Appellants’ claim 1.                 
                The Examiner relies on Matray and Jordan to make up for this deficiency in                   
                Lahiri.  Specifically, the Examiner finds that Matray “teaches a plurality of                
                specific binding pairs, each having a dissociation constant of 1 nM, in order                
                to provide high affinity between the binding partner and analyte in assays to                
                simultaneously detect a plurality of analytes in a sample.  See column 3,                    
                lines 43-44 and column 13, lines 9-23” (Answer 6).  In addition, the                         
                Examiner finds that Jordan “teaches highly selective ligands that eliminate                  
                any possibility of cross-reactivity between receptor types, in order to                      
                understand GPCR dimerization in a specific compound receptor field and to                    
                clarify the mechanism of the compounds towards the development of novel                      


                                                                                                            
                1 Clearly, to perform a competitive assay on an array comprising microspots                  
                of different proteins, the labeled cognate ligands must be capable of binding                
                to each protein microspotted to the substrate.  To do otherwise would defeat                 
                the intended purpose of the competitive binding assay.  See KSR Int’l Co. v.                 
                Teleflex Inc., 127 S. Ct. 1727, 1741, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1396 (2007) (It is                     
                proper to “take account of the inferences and creative steps that a person of                
                ordinary skill in the art would employ.”).  See also id. at 1742, 82 USPQ2d                  
                at 1397 (“A person of ordinary skill is also a person of ordinary creativity,                
                not an automaton.”).                                                                         
                                                     5                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013