Ex Parte Geier et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                           

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                                        Ex parte FREDDIE GEIER                                              
                                    AND STEFAN BAUER-SCHWAN                                                 
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-2128                                                
                                          Application 09/757,006                                            
                                         Technology Center 2100                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: August 31, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  

               Before HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, JAY P. LUCAS,                                                  
               and ST. JOHN COURTENAY, III,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                  

               BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This appeal involves claims 85-91.  Claims 1-74 have been canceled.                   
               Claims 75-84 have been withdrawn from consideration.  We have                                
               jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b), 134(a).                                                






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013