Ex Parte Radtke - Page 1



                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                       
                                             precedent of the Board.                                               

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                         Ex parte DAVID E. RADTKE                                                  
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                               Appeal 2007-2189                                                    
                                             Application 10/249,909                                                
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                             Decided: July 30, 2007                                                
                                                 ____________                                                      
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS,                                                        
                and PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  

                GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This appeal involves claims 1-11 and 13-28.  We have jurisdiction                           
                over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6 and 134.                                                
                       We REVERSE.                                                                                 








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013