onecle

Ex Parte Matsuoka et al - Page 1







                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                          ____________                                             
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                          ____________                                             
                                   Ex parte SAIJI MATSUOKA,                                        
                                    KAZUHIRO HANAZAWA,                                             
                                        TETSUO SHIMIZU                                             
                                               and                                                 
                                          KEI SAKATA                                               
                                          ____________                                             
                                         Appeal 2007-2207                                          
                                      Application 10/181,810                                       
                                     Technology Center 1700                                        
                                          ____________                                             
                                     Decided: October 29, 2007                                     
                                          ____________                                             
              Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and                                           
              LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
              KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                 

                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                    This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 3, 5, 13, 15, 27 and      
              28.  Claim 3 is illustrative:                                                        






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013