Ex Parte Seul et al - Page 1



                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                      
                                      is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                __________                                                   
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                   
                                                  Ex parte                                                   
                           MICHAEL SEUL, CHIU WO CHAU, HUI HUANG,                                            
                       SUKANTA BANERJEE, JIACHENG YANG, and YE HONG                                          
                                             Appeal 2007-2448                                                
                                          Application 10/192,352                                             
                                          Technology Center 1600                                             
                                                __________                                                   
                                       Decided:  September 11, 2007                                          
                                                __________                                                   
                Before  TONI R. SCHEINER, ERIC GRIMES, and NANCY J. LINCK,                                   
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a method                   
                for producing chips with biological molecules on their surfaces.  The                        
                Examiner has rejected the claims as anticipated and obvious.  We have                        
                jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We reverse.                                            
                                             BACKGROUND                                                      
                      “Typically, arrays of biological probes such as DNA, RNA or protein                    
                molecules are formed either by deposition and immobilization or by in-situ                   



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013