Ex Parte Johansson et al - Page 1



                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                                          
                                            not binding precedent of the Board.                                                     

                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                              
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                               
                                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                           Ex parte INGEGARD JOHANSSON                                                              
                                                               and                                                                  
                                               CHRISTINE STRANDBERG                                                                 
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                                      Appeal 2007-2552                                                              
                                                   Application 10/276,428                                                           
                                                  Technology Center 1700                                                            
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                                   Decided: July 31, 2007                                                           
                                                        ____________                                                                
                   Before CHARLES F. WARREN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and CATHERINE                                                         
                   Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                           
                   TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                               


                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                
                           Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) from the Examiner’s                                           
                   decision rejecting claims 1-20.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                    
                           We AFFIRM.                                                                                               







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013