Ex Parte 6379190 et al - Page 12

                Appeal 2007-2577                                                                             
                Application 90/006,344                                                                       
                depends on claim construction.  The question is a close one, depending                       
                heavily on the understanding of those in the art.27                                          
                      The evidence we have for how those skilled in the art would                            
                understand "permanently connect" in this context is the Prazoff                              
                specification, the Lin patent, and a dictionary definition Prazoff has                       
                supplied.  From Prazoff, one of skill would understand "permanently                          
                connect" to mean "securely affix" and to include molding the connectors to                   
                their respective rope lights.28  Lin explains how the connectors are attached                
                to the respective rope lights,29 but does not describe a situation in which the              
                connectors are removed from the rope lights.  This omission is remarkable                    
                since Lin does address disassembly of connectors from each other, removal                    
                of power plugs, and removal of a protective cylinder.30  Thus, one of skill                  
                would understand that while the connectors could be removed, Lin does not                    
                intend the connectors to be removed from the rope lights once they have                      
                                                                                                            
                27 We are aware of precedent holding that "permanently affixed" meant                        
                "unremovable".  K-2 Corp. v. Salomon S.A., 191 F.3d 1356, 1363,                              
                52 USPQ2d 1001, 1004 (Fed. Cir. 1999) (affirming a trial court                               
                construction).  We are also aware, however, of the pitfalls inherent in                      
                extending constructions from infringement cases to claims before the Office.                 
                Morris, 127 F.3d at 105_, 44 USPQ2d at 1029 (explaining the differences                      
                between claim construction in court infringement actions versus agency                       
                patentability determinations).  Ultimately, claim construction must be                       
                anchored in the understanding of those in the particular art at issue.  K-2                  
                Corp., 191 F.3d at 1363, 52 USPQ2d at 1006.                                                  
                28 Spec. 3:49-63.                                                                            
                29 Lin 3:58-4:32.                                                                            
                30 Lin 3:58-63 and 4:41-55.  The antecedent for "removal and disassembly"                    
                cited in the brief (at 23) is "light".  Lin 1:11-18.  Lin expects the user to                
                connect and disconnect the rope lights from each other.  As noted in the text,               
                Lin does not indicate that the connectors are ever to be removed from the                    
                rope lights.                                                                                 
                                                     12                                                      

Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013