Ex Parte Gulbenkian - Page 1

                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                       
                                      is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                    Ex parte JACQUES GULBENKIAN                                               
                                             Appeal 2007-2596                                                 
                                           Application 10/370,634                                             
                                          Technology Center 3600                                              
                                        Decided: September 13, 2007                                           
                Before ERIC GRIMES, LORA M. GREEN, and RICHARD M.                                             
                LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
                GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 involving claims to a                           
                post-tensioning system for concrete structures.  The Examiner has rejected                    
                the claims as anticipated and obvious.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                  
                 6(b).  We reverse the anticipation rejection, vacate the appealed                           
                obviousness rejections, and enter new obviousness rejections under 37                         
                C.F.R.  41.50(b).                                                                            

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013