Appeal 2007-3258
Application 10/916,195
1 Claims on appeal
2 In its Appeal Brief, Goodyear does not single out any dependent claim
3 for separate consideration apart from claim 1.
4 Accordingly, we decide the appeal on the basis of claim 1. 37 C.F.R.
5 § 41.67(c)(1)(vii) (2006).
6 Claim 1 reads (Appeal Br., Claims Appendix):
7 A pneumatic tire comprising at least one oxygen scavenging
8 barrier, the barrier comprising a polyester copolymer, said
9 polyester copolymer comprising a copolycondensate of
10 polyester and a polyolefin oligomer.
11
12 Katsuki
13 Katsuki relates to a laminate suitable for use with pneumatic tires
14 having a gas-impermeable layer, such as an inner liner, which is capable of
15 maintaining a requisite air pressure. Col. 1:4-7.
16 An object of the Katsuki invention is to provide a laminate comprising
17 a laminated film and a rubber layer, the laminate being suitable for use as a
18 component of a pneumatic tire and having an air pressure retentivity
19 sufficient to retain the required air pressure in the tire. Col. 1:63 through
20 col. 2:1.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013