Appeal 2007-3258
Application 10/916,195
1 G. Conclusions of law
2 Goodyear has not sustained its burden on appeal of showing that the
3 Examiner erred in rejecting the claims on appeal as being unpatentable under
4 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the prior art.
5 On the record before us, Goodyear is not entitled to a patent
6 containing claims 1-8, 11, 13 and 15-16 on appeal.
7
8 H. Decision
9 ORDERED that the decision of the Examiner rejecting
10 claims 1-8, 11, 13 and 15-16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the prior art is
11 affirmed.
12 FURTHER ORDERED that no time period for taking any
13 subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under
14 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
cc (via First Class mail)
Attorney and address
John D. DeLong, Esq.
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
1144 East Market Street
Akron, Ohio 44316-0001
Tel: 330-796-8457
14
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Last modified: September 9, 2013