Ex Parte Joly et al - Page 10

                Appeal 2007-3363                                                                             
                Application 10/342,711                                                                       
                                              CONCLUSION                                                     
                      The subject matter of claim 1 would have been obvious to a person                      
                having ordinary skill in the art.  Since claims 2-4 and 21-24 stand or fall                  
                with claim 1, they fall with claim 1.  The rejection of claims 1-4 and 21-24                 
                is—                                                                                          
                                                AFFIRMED                                                     









                yrt                                                                                          









                Joseph T. Guy                                                                                
                NEXSEN PRUET JACOBS & POLLARD LLP                                                            
                201 W MCBEE AVE                                                                              
                GREENVILLE SC 29603                                                                          





                                                     10                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10

Last modified: September 9, 2013