Appeal 2007-3372
Application 10/651,351
For the reasons set forth above, it follows that we shall sustain the
Examiner’s obviousness rejection as it pertains to the above-identified
dependent claims.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1-4, 9-12, 14, 15, 19-22,
24, 25, 29, and 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Takahashi in view of Yasuzato; and to reject claims 6-8, 16-18, and 26-28
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Takahashi in view of
Yasuzato and Nozue is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
tc/ls
TRASK BRITT
P.O. BOX 2550
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84110
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Last modified: September 9, 2013