Ex Parte Nedez et al - Page 3

                Appeal 2007-3383                                                                             
                Application 10/452,939                                                                       
                      38.  A process for eliminating sulphur from a feed containing                          
                hydrogen sulphide, sulphur dioxide, carbon oxysulphide and/or carbon                         
                sulphide and a minimal quantity of benzene, toluene and/or xylenes, said                     
                process comprising:                                                                          
                      introducing said feed into a reaction zone comprising two reactors in                  
                series, each reactor containing a bed with a first catalyst, and recovering                  
                elemental sulphur and an effluent that is at least partially free of sulphur,                
                      wherein said first catalyst can be the same or different in each reactor               
                and is at least one catalyst containing a support comprising at least one                    
                compound selected from the group consisting of alumina, titanium oxide and                   
                zirconia, the support further comprising at least one doping element selected                
                from the group consisting or iron, cobalt, nickel, copper and vanadium,                      
                      each of said reactors further comprises a bed with a catalyst A which                  
                is different from said first catalyst, and can be the same or different in each              
                reactor, wherein, in each reactor, said first catalyst is disposed upstream of               
                catalyst A and acts as a protective layer for said catalyst A, and                           
                      wherein said feed contains 50-50,000 volume ppm of benzene,                            
                toluene and/or xylenes, and said feed contains 200 ppm or less of O2.                        
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references as evidence                  
                of unpatentability:                                                                          
                Michel   US 3,939,250  Feb. 17, 1976                                                         
                Tellier   US 4,192,857  Mar. 11, 1980                                                        
                Voirin   US 4,605,546  Aug. 12, 1986                                                         
                Burmaster   US 6,776,974 B1  Aug. 17, 2004                                                   
                   The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows:                               
                   1. Claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 13, 15-22, 28-31 and 34 are rejected under                       
                      35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Tellier in view of                       
                      Burmaster and Michel.                                                                  
                   2. Claims 38, 40, and 42 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                   
                      unpatentable over Tellier in view of Burmaster and Michel.                             

                                                     3                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013