Appeal 2007-3383
Application 10/452,939
view of Burmaster, Michel and Voirin for the same reasons we affirmed the
Examiner’s rejection of claim 1.
DECISION
We AFFIRM the Examiner’s § 103(a) rejection of claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 8,
13, 15-22, 28-31 and 34 over Tellier in view of Barmaster and Michel.
We AFFIRM the Examiner’s § 103(a) rejection of claims 38, 40, and
42 over Tellier in view of Barmaster and Michel.
We AFFIRM the Examiner’s § 103(a) rejection of claims 2, 4, 9, 12,
14, 23-27, 39, and 41 over Tellier in view of Burmaster, Michel and Voirin
The Examiner’s decision is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
cam
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013