Ex Parte Mathys et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                 
                                         precedent of the Board.                                           
                                                                                                          
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                              ____________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                 
                           Ex parte PETER MATHYS, ROBERT SCHAETTI,                                         
                                        and ZDRAVKO MANDIC                                                 
                                              ____________                                                 
                                            Appeal 2007-3844                                               
                                         Application 10/832,881                                            
                                         Technology Center 1700                                            
                                              ____________                                                 
                                      Decided: September 18, 2007                                          
                                              ____________                                                 

               Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                 
               LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            

               KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of               
               claims 1, 2, and 9-24, the only claims that remain pending in this                          
               application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6 and 134.                      







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013