Ex Parte Mathys et al - Page 2

               Appeal 2007-3844                                                                            
               Application 10/832,881                                                                      


                      Appellants’ invention is directed to a static mixer including a low                  
               viscosity fluid mixing device (Specification 1).  The static mixer includes                 
               flow obstacles that form fluid flow path constrictions.  According to                       
               Appellants, the primary flow obstacles are geometrically modified on                        
               surfaces or edges thereof to improve the mixing and compensate for axial                    
               and radial inhomogeneities in the fluid (Specification 2).  Claim 1 is                      
               illustrative and reproduced below:                                                          
                      1. A mixing device for a static mixer comprising                                     
                      a plurality of primary flow obstacles disposed to define constrictions               
               there-between for a flow of viscous fluid therethrough and to impart a flow                 
               of a first order in the flow of viscous fluid passing through said constrictions            
               including vortex spheres which periodically separate off at said obstacles to               
               produce radial and axial inhomogeneities in the form of axial concentration                 
               differences in the flow of viscous fluid;                                                   
                      each said primary flow obstacle having a geometrically modified area                 
               at at least one of  a surface thereof and an edge thereof to induce local flows             
               of a second order in the flow of viscous fluid passing thereover whereby said               
               local flows of said second order are superimposed on said flows of said first               
               order to compensate said radial and axial inhomogeneities in the viscous                    
               fluid produced by the flow of said first order.                                             
                                                                                                          
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references as evidence                
               in rejecting the appealed claims:                                                           
               Lloyd    US 2,426,833   Sep. 2, 1947                                                        
               Seah    US 4,710,326   Dec. 1, 1987                                                         
               Fleischli   US 6,811,302 B2   Nov. 2, 2004                                                  
                      Claims 1, 2, and 9-24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being               
               unpatentable over Fleischli in view of Lloyd.   Claims 1, 2, and 9-24 stand                 


                                                    2                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013