Hawaii Revised Statutes 291e. Use of Intoxicants While Operating a Vehicle

PART I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

  • 291e-1 Definitions.
    As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: "Administrative revocation" means termination of the respondent's license, and the privilege to operate a...
  • 291e-2 Medical Services.
    The several county and state government physicians shall, or any other qualified person may, make whatever tests and analyses as may be requested of...
  • 291e-3 Evidence of Intoxication.
    (a) In any criminal prosecution for a violation of section 291E-61 or 291E-61.5 or in any proceeding under part III: (1) .08 or more...
  • 291e-4 Convictions and Acts Prior to January 1, 2002.
    (a) Any: (1) Conviction for an offense under section 200-81, 291-4, 291-4.4, or 291-7 as those sections were in effect on December 31, 2001;...
  • 291e-5 Ignition Interlock User Affordability.
    The director of transportation shall contract with the selected ignition interlock vendor to provide partial financial relief for the installation and the periodic calibration...
  • 291e-6 Ignition Interlock Devices; Certification.
    (a) The director of transportation shall establish and administer a statewide program relating to certification and monitoring of ignition interlock devices installed pursuant to...
  • 291e-7 Trauma System Surcharge.
    (a) In addition to any other civil penalties ordered by the court, a person who violates any offense under this part may be ordered...

PART II. TESTING AND IMPLIED CONSENT

PART III. ADMINISTRATIVE REVOCATION PROCESS

PART IV. PROHIBITED CONDUCT

Case Notes

The completion of certain administrative driver's license revocation office forms by defendant and subsequent transmittal of the forms by a civilian police officer for the Navy to the office did not violate the Posse Comitatus Act as (1) the enforcement of Hawaii state law against military personnel on a military base does not infringe on civil authority, and (2) a primary purpose for the completion and transmittal was established; thus, suspension of defendant's license affirmed. 110 H. 172, 130 P.3d 1037.

Last modified: October 27, 2016