Michael G. Kroposki - Page 4

                                                - 4 -                                                 

            May 1, 1992, denying any grounds for an ADEA claim but allowing                           
            for further discussion.  Following one or more telephone                                  
            conversations between counsel for Boehringer and counsel for                              
            petitioner, Boehringer’s counsel again wrote to petitioner’s                              
            counsel on June 12, 1992 (the June 12 letter).  The June 12                               
            letter recites various separation benefits that petitioner                                
            already had received, offers “to increase the original severance                          
            offer to * * * [petitioner] by $2,500”, offers to make the total                          
            payment in January 1993 as requested by petitioner, and notes                             
            that the following documents accompany the letter:  (1) a draft                           
            letter of recommendation that would be signed by the appropriate                          
            Boehringer official and (2) a “revised Release and Settlement                             
            Agreement”.                                                                               
                  Subsequent to the June 12 letter, petitioner and Boehringer                         
            entered into an agreement entitled “Settlement and General                                
            Release Agreement” (the final agreement).  The final agreement                            
            contains numerous recitals, including the following:  (1) that                            
            petitioner’s employment relationship with Boehringer had been                             
            terminated, (2) that petitioner “has made certain claims for                              
            damages against * * * [Boehringer], including those set forth in                          
            * * * [the April 23 letter]”, (3) that petitioner alleges “that                           
            the termination of the employment relationship was unjust and                             
            discriminatory”, and (4) that Boehringer denies those allegations                         
            and asserts that it was legally entitled to terminate its                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011