Michael G. Kroposki - Page 8

                                                - 8 -                                                 

            61(a)(1); sec. 1.61-2(a)(1), Income Tax Regs.  With an exception                          
            not here relevant, gross income does not include “the amount of                           
            any damages received (whether by suit or agreement * * *) on                              
            account of personal injuries or sickness”.  Sec. 104(a)(2).  “The                         
            term ‘damages received (whether by suit or agreement)’ means an                           
            amount received * * * through prosecution of a legal suit or                              
            action based upon tort or tort type rights, or through a                                  
            settlement agreement entered into in lieu of such prosecution.”                           
            Sec. 1.104-1(c), Income Tax Regs. (emphasis added).  Only                                 
            payments received to settle bona fide disputes may be excluded                            
            under section 104(a)(2).  See, e.g., Taggi v. United States, 35                           
            F.3d 93, 96 (2d Cir. 1994).                                                               
                  Respondent argues that the payment is an item of taxable                            
            compensation for services, viz, severance pay.  Petitioner does                           
            not disagree that, if the payment is compensation for services,                           
            it is taxable compensation for services.  Rather, petitioner                              
            argues that the payment is not compensation for services but is                           
            damages received in settlement of various claims.  Petitioner                             
            requests that this Court apportion the payment between damages                            
            received on account of his claim of age discrimination (which                             
            petitioner concedes is an item of gross income; see Commissioner                          
            v. Schleier, 515 U.S. 323 (1995) (recovery under the Age                                  
            Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 is not excludable under                          
            section 104(a)(2)) and damages received on account of his other                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011