- 2 - Accordingly, we rule on petitioners' motion based on the parties' submissions and the existing record. Rule 232(a)(1). The portions of our opinion on the merits in the instant case, Lozon v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-250 (Lozon I), that are relevant to our disposition of this motion are incorporated herein by this reference. After concessions,2 the issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioners are the prevailing party in the underlying tax case; (2) whether petitioners unreasonably protracted the Court's proceeding; and (3) whether the amounts of litigation costs claimed by petitioners are reasonable. Background Petitioners were Neighborhood Office Agents (NOA's) of Allstate Insurance Co. (Allstate). The substantive issues in Lozon I were: (1) Whether petitioners performed services for Allstate as employees or as independent contractors 1 (...continued) (effective with respect to proceedings commenced after Nov. 10, 1988). The petition in this case was filed on Dec. 8, 1994; therefore, the provisions of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L. 104-168, sec. 701, 110 Stat. 1452, 1463-1464 (1996) (effective with respect to proceedings commenced after July 30, 1996), are not applicable here. See Maggie Management Co. v. Commissioner, 108 T.C. 430 (1997). Unless otherwise indicated, references to other sections are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. 2 Respondent concedes that petitioners exhausted their administrative remedies, substantially prevailed, and met the net worth requirements.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011