M.I.C. Limited - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          only multiuse, multimedia adult entertainment complex operating             
          within the City.                                                            
               In 1985, the City had approached MIC and Beverly and                   
          attempted to negotiate an agreement to purchase the Property.               
          An initial meeting was held in May 1985, and the City made an               
          offer based on what it stated was the fair market value of the              
          Property.  The City stated that the Property was worth less than            
          $700,000.  The City later obtained an appraisal that stated that            
          the Property was worth $723,000.                                            
               Petitioners rejected the City's offer.  Petitioners then               
          obtained two appraisals that respectively stated that the                   
          Property was worth $1,950,000 and $2,100,000.  On December 9,               
          1987, the City notified petitioners that it would acquire title             
          to the Property by condemnation, and, shortly thereafter, the               
          City petitioned the local court to condemn the Property by                  
          eminent domain.  The City named as respondents in the petition              
          all persons and entities that had, or could have had, a claim to            
          any interest in the Property.  The respondents listed in the                
          petition included MIC, Beverly, and certain other persons who are           
          not relevant to our case.                                                   
               The court assigned the case to a panel of three                        
          commissioners to ascertain the condemnees' award.  Before the               
          commissioners independently ascertained an award, the parties to            
          the condemnation proceeding settled their dispute.  The                     
          settlement, which occurred in January 1989, followed                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011