M.I.C. Limited - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          74 T.C. 1005, 1010-1011 (1980); Kendall v. Commissioner, 31 T.C.            
          549, 554 (1958); Bymaster v. Commissioner, 20 T.C. 649, 653-654             
          (1953); Allaben v.  Commissioner, 35 B.T.A. 327, 328 (1937); see            
          also Lapham v. United States, 178 F.2d 994, 996 (2d Cir. 1950).             
          As this Court has stated, "a lump sum purchase price is not to be           
          rationalized after the event of sale as representing a                      
          combination of factors which might have been separately stated in           
          the contract if the parties had seen fit to do so."  Bymaster v.            
          Commissioner, supra at 653-654.                                             
               The result is different, however, when the condemnation                
          award is actually compensation for nonproperty items, such as               
          interest or a waiver of legal rights.  The fact that an award               
          includes compensation for nonproperty rights may be evidenced by            
          the award's being significantly in excess of the value of the               
          property taken.  In such a case, the Court has allocated part of            
          the award to the nonproperty interests.  See Smith v.                       
          Commissioner, 59 T.C. 107 (1972); see also Estate of Walter v.              
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1971-244.                                          
               The primary argument in respondent's brief is that MIC is              
          taxable on $1,017,500 (rather than $1,162,215 as shown in the               
          notice of deficiency) of the condemnation award because the award           
          included damages for going concern value and certain covenants.             
          Respondent states that this amount is taxable to MIC because MIC            
          was the party that actually received and used the proceeds from             
          the award.  Respondent does not contest that $820,000 of the                




Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011