Leonard Pipeline Contractors, Ltd. - Page 6

                                         -6-                                          
               On its 1987 fiscal year return, petitioner deducted the amount         
          of salary and bonus ($1,777,800) it paid Mr. Leonard.                       
               In 1985, Mr. Leonard and his wife initiated  divorce                   
          proceedings, and in 1987, they divorced.  Pursuant to their                 
          property settlement, Mr. Leonard provided his former wife money and         
          property valued at $1.68 million.                                           
                                       OPINION                                        
               The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has directed           
          us to further explain the method we employed to arrive at $700,000          
          as reasonable compensation for Mr. Leonard in 1987.  Leonard                
          Pipeline Contractors, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 142 F.3d at 1136.  With         
          the discussion that follows, we attempt to provide the Court of             
          Appeals with "a trail" to follow as to how we reached our prior             
          conclusion.  See Akers v. Commissioner, 798 F.2d 894, 897 (6th Cir.         
          1986), revg. and remanding T.C. Memo. 1984-208; Estate of Gilford           
          v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 38, 50 (1987); Symington v. Commissioner,          
          87 T.C. 892, 904 (1986).                                                    






               3(...continued)                                                        
               personally guaranteed by him.  Not until now, with the                 
               contract completed and the benefits from subsequent                    
               grading and fencing contracts awarded being realized,                  
               is the corporation in a position to adequately                         
               compensate its President for his unique and extremely                  
               profitable contribution to the corporation.                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011