David J. and Jo Dena Johnson - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                          
               6.   Section 6702(b) states that the penalty imposed by                 
                    subsection (a) shall be in addition to some other                  
                    penalty being imposed, thus it cannot be imposed alone.            
          B.   The Lien and Levy Proceeding                                            
               Petitioners received a “Final Notice - Notice of Intent to              
          Levy & Your Notice of a Right to a Hearing” and filed a Request              
          for a Collection Due Process Hearing (Form 12153), dated June 19,            
          2000.  In their request for a hearing, petitioners asked that the            
          Appeals officer have at the hearing: (1) The name of respondent’s            
          employee who imposed the frivolous return penalty and his or her             
          Federal ID number; (2) the delegation of authority from the                  
          Secretary authorizing persons to impose the frivolous return                 
          penalty; (3) official job descriptions of respondent’s employees             
          who imposed the frivolous return penalty; (4) copies of the                  
          regulations that allow Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employees              
          to impose the frivolous return penalty; and (5) copies of the                
          Code section that makes petitioners liable for income tax.                   
               By letter dated July 7, 2000, respondent’s Appeals officer,             
          Gayla L. Owens (Owens), told petitioners that their case had been            
          assigned to her.  She asked them whether they wanted a face-to-              
          face conference in Mobile, Alabama, which is respondent’s Appeals            
          Office closest to their residence, or whether they preferred to              
          handle the matter by telephone or correspondence.                            
               By letter dated July 19, 2000, petitioner asked that the                
          hearing not be scheduled before September 15, 2000, in part                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011